<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Let Embedded Tool Chain Slow You Down.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.renaissancesoftware.net/blog/archives/41/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.renaissancesoftware.net/blog/archives/41</link>
	<description>Blogging about Agile Development, especially embedded.  Follow me on twitter: jwgrenning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwgrenning</title>
		<link>http://www.renaissancesoftware.net/blog/archives/41/comment-page-1#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>jwgrenning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 18:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.renaissancesoftware.net/blog/?p=41#comment-513</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve also done some TDD with the IAR simulator.  It works well for what I did.  I am running on a centrino PC, six years old, so I still get a pretty good delay.  But I think that a modern PC would erase most the delay.  I&#039;ll do an experiment next time I&#039;m with my gear, and add in some timing information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also done some TDD with the IAR simulator.  It works well for what I did.  I am running on a centrino PC, six years old, so I still get a pretty good delay.  But I think that a modern PC would erase most the delay.  I&#8217;ll do an experiment next time I&#8217;m with my gear, and add in some timing information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark T</title>
		<link>http://www.renaissancesoftware.net/blog/archives/41/comment-page-1#comment-508</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 15:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.renaissancesoftware.net/blog/?p=41#comment-508</guid>
		<description>What about simulators? Instruction set sims or more complicated beasts like full-system simulator like Virtutech.  Anyone using them with TDD?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about simulators? Instruction set sims or more complicated beasts like full-system simulator like Virtutech.  Anyone using them with TDD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://www.renaissancesoftware.net/blog/archives/41/comment-page-1#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.renaissancesoftware.net/blog/?p=41#comment-498</guid>
		<description>A good explanation for Test Driven Development 
http://www.typemock.com/Test_Driven_Development_TDD.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good explanation for Test Driven Development<br />
<a href="http://www.typemock.com/Test_Driven_Development_TDD.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.typemock.com/Test_Driven_Development_TDD.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Kern</title>
		<link>http://www.renaissancesoftware.net/blog/archives/41/comment-page-1#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Kern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.renaissancesoftware.net/blog/?p=41#comment-490</guid>
		<description>If you trust the process that goes from your code to the embedded system (cross compiling or not), then you should feel comfortable getting the bulk of the tests out of the way in your *fast* development environment.

When I did work for systems that involved fire control radar, or flight control systems, or missile transponders, or manned centrifuges... you certainly cannot easily do HITL testing too often :-\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you trust the process that goes from your code to the embedded system (cross compiling or not), then you should feel comfortable getting the bulk of the tests out of the way in your *fast* development environment.</p>
<p>When I did work for systems that involved fire control radar, or flight control systems, or missile transponders, or manned centrifuges&#8230; you certainly cannot easily do HITL testing too often :-\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
